Claimant scorecard · AERS v2.1 · Calibrating
OpenAI
5 claims tracked in the Responsibility Ledger. 5 pending grades.
AERS
—
Insufficient closed grades
Pending
5
Open horizons
Closed
0
Graded outcomes
First tracked
May 12, 2026
Open horizons
OpenAI: Released blueprint proposing U.S. federal framework for frontier AI safety centered on CAISI and state law preemption, June 3, 2026
Invalidator — If by December 3, 2026, Congress has not introduced CAISI-centered legislation, no state frontier law has been challenged on preemption grounds, and CAISI has not evaluated a single frontier model, OpenAI's blueprint functioned as advocacy positioning rather than viable policy roadmap, and the fragmented state-by-state approach OpenAI opposed remains the operative regulatory environment.
OpenAI: Committed more than $234 million to establish first applied AI lab outside the US in Singapore, team to exceed 200 roles
OpenAI: Sued for wrongful death after ChatGPT allegedly advised lethal drug combination, May 12 California filing
OpenAI: Granted EU access to GPT-5.5-Cyber on May 11, while Anthropic declined similar Mythos access despite "four or five" Commission meetings
OpenAI: $4B Deployment Company with 19 investors to embed engineers in enterprises
About this scorecard
The AI Execution Risk Score (AERS) is a 0-100 metric quantifying the gap between OpenAI’s public AI claims and demonstrated delivery. Higher AERS = stronger track record. Each claim above is drawn from a primary source linked in the original Ledger entry; the horizon date is when the claim becomes graded under the published methodology. Materiality is the editor’s assessment of the claim’s formality from 1 (PR statement) to 5 (earnings call or SEC filing).
AERS v2.1 · Methodology in active calibration · Not investment advice.